1 Introduction
Silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology has been regarded as a good candidate for radiation-hardening applications in military and space. SOI is advantageous over traditional bulk silicon CMOS primarily because of its insusceptibility from the latch-up effect of four layers with p-n-p-n structure as a result of the complete dielectric isolation of individual transistors[1,2]. However, ionizing radiation generally degrades electrical performance of MOS devices by creating interface traps and oxide-trapped charge in gate dielectric. Introducing buried oxide layers increases susceptibility of SOI devices, while bulk transistors suffer total-ionizing-dose (TID) radiation damage in deep submicron processes [3-5]. The precise underlying mechanism of this effect, particularly the role of impact ionization, remains controversial.
Studies on the TID effect on circuits of SOI device [6-10], have mainly focused on degradation of electrical performance and physical mechanisms by irradiation. However, differences in manufacturing process, layout design, irradiation bias condition, and testing voltage can cause different degeneration activities. Consequently, experiments and mechanism analysis for this special phenomenon should be conducted.
The space environment is generally of low radiation dose rates, whereas ground tests encounter a considerably larger range of dose rates. Such a difference may have diverse impacts on radiation degradation of the devices, hence the need of studying differences in damage mechanisms of the devices in the space and on the ground. The dose rate effects on electrical characteristics of bulk silicon MOS devices [11,12] or bipolar transistors [13-16] are usually considered. However, very few studies on the dose rate effect of SOI MOS devices, especially the with H-gate structure, have been conducted.
This study is focused on the radiation effects on 0.8 μm H-gate partially-depleted-silicon-on-insulator (PDSOI) NMOS devices exposed to 60Co γ-rays at different dose rates. The shift in output characteristic curves, the irradiation bias-state effect on decays of the body current at different dose rates, and the dose rate effect of back-gate transconductance, were analyzed. The carrier mobility degenerated because of the reduction in the interface state density and the scattering effect of the interface state on the channel electrons. The shift in the saturation current at high dose rate was greater than that at low dose rate, when the total dose was not high. In addition, the body current and the transconductance of the back gate had the enhanced-low-dose-rate- sensitivity (ELDRS) under OFF-bias irradiation condition.
2 Experimental and device structures
PDSOI nMOSFETs fabricated using light doped drain source technology, with an H-gate bilateral body-contacted structure, were used in this study. Ceramic package was applied to all test samples. Their layout structure is shown in Fig.1. The thicknesses are: the top silicon film, tSi =160 nm; the gate oxide, tox=17.5 nm; and buried oxide, tbox= 375 nm. The gate width/length ratio(W/L) was 8 μm/0.8 μm, and the working voltage was 5 V.
-201710/1001-8042-28-10-014/alternativeImage/1001-8042-28-10-014-F001.jpg)
The sample irradiations were performed on the 60Co γ-ray source at Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, at does rates 36 and 1800 Gy(Si)/h. Accordingly, the radiation doses for the low dose rate conditions are 0.36, 0.5 and 1 kGy(Si), whereas 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3 kGy(Si) are considered high dose rates. The irradiation bias states of test devices are given in Table 1, where VG, VS, VD, VB, and VSub are the voltage of the gate, source, drain, body and substrate, respectively. The break time between two irradiations was limited within half an hour to avoid the anneal effect. During these break times, the electric characteristic parameters and the I-V curves before and after irradiation were collected using a computer-controlled HP4156 precision semiconductor parameter analyzer at room temperature.
Bias state of sample | VG | VS | VD | VB | VSub |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ON-bias | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OFF-bias | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Dose rate effect on front-gate characteristic
Figure 2 shows the front-gate ID-VD curves of 0.8 μm PDSOI NMOS devices before and after irradiation at dose rates of 36 and 1800 Gy/h, under the gate voltage of VG =1, 3 and 5 V, the total dose of 0.5 and 1 kGy(Si), and the irradiation state of OFF-bias. The drain current at 1 kGy(Si) was greater than that at 0.5 kGy(Si). At VG = 1 V, the drain current increased significantly with the drain voltage VD, reaching 0.573 mA at 1 kGy(Si), i.e. the TID effects. Given that the threshold voltage shifts in a negative direction, the conducting channel is formed and the devices are more easily switched at VG =1 V and TID= 1 kGy(Si).
-201710/1001-8042-28-10-014/alternativeImage/1001-8042-28-10-014-F002.jpg)
From the results of 36 Gy(Si)/h (low dose rate, Figs. 2a–2c) and 1.8 kGy(Si)/h (high dose rate, Figs. 2d–2f), the drain shift at high dose rate is considerably worse than that at low dose rate. The saturation currents are especially sensitive to the dose rate effect at 1 kGy(Si) and VG=5V.
When VDS≥VDSsat and VGS≥Vth, the saturation current is determined as follows
where IDsat and VDsat are the saturation current and voltage, respectively; VGS is the gate-to-source voltage; Vth is the threshold voltage, Cox is the capacitance of the gate oxide, and μ is the carrier mobility.
The dose rate effects at low dose rate results in more serious degeneration of threshold voltage than that at high dose rate [17,18], i.e. Vth(low-dose-rate) < Vth(high-dose-rate). Substituting this into Eq.(2), we have VDSsat(low-dose-rate) > VDSsat(high-dose-rate).
Considering the above factors for Eq. (1), the shift in VDSsat at low dose rate should be greater than that at high dose rate. However, Fig. 2 shows that the shift in VDSsat at low dose rate is smaller than that at high dose rate. This inconsistency between the calculated and measured data may be caused by excluding the dose rate effect on carrier mobility.
The drain current, gate-to-source voltage, and drain-to-source voltage can be related by
In this section, we mainly study the TID effect on saturation characteristics of SOI MOS devices. Thus, carrier mobility can be determined from Eq.(3) using the ID and VGS data at measured at VD=5 V as shown in Fig. 3, where the mobility degradation at 36 Gy/h is more serious than that at 1.8 kGy/h.
-201710/1001-8042-28-10-014/alternativeImage/1001-8042-28-10-014-F003.jpg)
The radiation-degradation of mobility should be taken into account by[19]
where μ0 is the mobility before irradiation, Not is the density of trapped oxide charges, Nit is the density of interface-state, and αot and αit are the fitting parameters. Eq. (4) shows that the factor causing the shift in carrier mobility is classified into two parts, namely, trapped oxide charge and interface state. The space-charge model[20] is a widely accepted model to explain the differences in degeneration of electrical characteristics of devices at different dose rates. The local electrical field formed by trapped hole at high dose rate prevents protons from transporting towards the interface, which enhances the density of interface state at low dose rate than at high dose rate. Thus, only minor differences are found in Not for the same irradiation dose at different dose rates and the interface state is the main reason for dose rate effect of mobility.
Other bimolecular mechanisms affecting the buildup of interface-state include the recombination of free electrons and holes; recombination of free electrons and hole trapping defects; and hydrogen dimerization reaction to form hydrogen molecule. The low dose rate irradiation is effective, because bimolecular recombination has little effect. Consequently, effective trapped oxide charges and interface states are increasingly induced. However, the less effective irradiation at high dose rate causes interface traps, because the hole and electron densities increase with the dose rate. Thus, an electron is more likely to recombine with a trapped hole before that hole simulates the release of a proton.
The combination of space-charge model and bimolecular recombination model leads to different densities of interface state at different dose rates. The relationship between dose rate and interface state can be described by a constant at low dose rates, a linear function in the transition region, and another constant at high dose rates [21-23]. The first crossover dose rate is 0.36 Gy(Si)/h and the second, 3.6 kGy(Si)/h. In comparison, the dose rates in this work, 36 Gy(Si)/h and 1.8 kGy(Si)/h, belong to the linear region, and the interface state is linearly related to dose rate. In this case, the density of interface state at 36 Gy(Si)/h is greater than that at 1.8 kGy(Si)/h. Therefore, the increase in interface-state density can enhance the scattering effect of the interface state on carriers in the channel, decreasing the carrier mobility at 1.8 kGy(Si)/h. Consequently, the shift in the saturation drain current at 36 Gy(Si)/h is slightly worse than that at 1.8 kGy(Si)/h (Fig.2).
3.2 Dose rate effect of body-current under different irradiation bias states
Figure 4 shows the body current dependence of gate voltage under test conditions at drain bias of 5 V. The curves of empty and solid dots are the IB-VG characteristic at 36 Gy(Si)/h and 1 kGy(Si)/h, respectively. Both the pre- and after-irradiation IB-VG curves have the upside down hump-shaped variations of the body current with increasing gate voltage.
-201710/1001-8042-28-10-014/alternativeImage/1001-8042-28-10-014-F004.jpg)
In the IB-VG curves after radiation under ON-bias (Fig.4a), the conductive channel is formed when the gate voltage is greater than the threshold voltage. Electrons can drift from source to drain regions, and then large numbers of ehps(electron- hole-pairs) are created by the electron impact ionization under high electrical field of the depletion region. Most of the electrons generated are swept to the drain side and contribute to the drain current. Meanwhile, holes are collected to the body area because of their heavy equivalent mass. However, the threshold voltage gradually decreases with increasing TIDs. So, the gate voltage of the first detected body current shifts in the negative direction. The holes trapped in the buried oxide can also significantly weaken the lateral electric field[24], which influences the body current strongly, hence the decrease of the maximum body current with increasing doses. However, the shift value is not affected by the dose rate.
Figure 4(b) shows the test results of IB-VGS curves after radiation at OFF-bias. The strong electric fields are mainly located at the space charge region of the drain-body junction, the bottom of body region and source region, and back-interface of buried oxide[25,26], all of which can promote the trap to capture numerous holes. By contrast, ON-bias just applies the work voltage on the gate, which remarkably reduces the density of trapped hole near the Si/SiO2 interface on the side of buried oxide than that in OFF-bias. Consequently, OFF-bias facilitates the conduction of the back channel. Body current is collected when the device is OFF state and increases with the density of trapped hole and the TID.
The insert of Fig. 4(b) illustrates a convex-concave peak of body current at 36 Gy(Si)/h and TID= 1 kGy(Si), while it does not appear at 1.8 kGy(Si)/h and TID= 1 kGy(Si). The body current at 36 Gy(Si)/h is greater than that at 1.8 kGy(Si)/h when the gate voltages are negative. This indicates that more holes transport in the body region at 36 Gy(Si)/h. When the gate voltage is negative, the maximum body currents are −5.17 and −4.12 μA at 1 kGy(Si)-36 Gy(Si)/h and 3 kGy(Si)-1.8 kGy(Si)/h, respectively. However, these are not observed under ON-bias conditions because of asymmetrical distribution of the electric potential under OFF-bias conditions, at drain voltage of 5 V with the source and gate being grounded, rather than symmetrical distribution of the electric potential under ON-bias and the same conditions of the gate, drain and source. Thus, ehps induced by total dose irradiation are separated quickly by an applied electric field, which is mainly the gate voltage. Then main effect of a positive gate bias is to remove the electrons, thereby decreasing the fraction that recombines with the trapped holes and resulting in no dose rate sensitivity. Therefore, we can see clearly that OFF-bias can lead to ELDRS of the body current for H-gate PDSOI MOSFET devices.
3.3 Dose rate effect in buried oxide for PDSOI devices
Figure 5 shows the transconductance of back-gate at different dose rates and TIDs. The back-gate voltage of the peak transconductance shifts in a negative direction with TIDs, for both the dose rates. This is because that changes in the position of maximum transconductance are mainly influenced by the shift in the threshold voltage. The threshold voltages at TID< 1 kGy(Si) do not differ obviously.
-201710/1001-8042-28-10-014/alternativeImage/1001-8042-28-10-014-F005.jpg)
In Fig.5(a), the double peak of back-gate transconductance is seen at 3 kGy(Si). This characteristic is not evident in both the pre-irradiation and doses of ≤ 2 kGy(Si). The interface state at the SiO2/Si interface between the buried oxide and silicon layer may cause the double-peak phenomenon. The interface state can introduce local permitted state in the band gap of Si, which will further form continuous or discrete electronic energy levels. These energy levels increase with the dose, enhancing the capturing of the channel electron by the donor interface-state of the back gate.
Figure 5(c) shows the normalized maximum transconductance of the back-gate at low and high dose rates as a function of irradiation dose, which are extracted from Fig.5(b). The decay of maximum transconductance at 36 Gy(Si)/h is much worse than at 1.8 kGy(Si)/h, and the decay trend for 1.8 kGy(Si)/h is gradually retarded as the dose increases. MOSFET is a device with a surface channel. On the one hand, the channel electron is scattered by the interface state, resulting in decreasing mobility. On the other hand, the channel electron can fill the interface trap, leading to decreased trap density. These can cause the reduction in transconductance with increasing dose. Meanwhile, the interface state density at 36 Gy(Si)/h is larger than that at 1.8 kGy(Si)/h. Thus, the ELDRS effect appears in the decay of back-gate transconductance.
4 Conclusion
The impact of total irradiation dose on 0.8 μm H-gate PDSOI NMOS devices exposed to 60Co γ-rays at different dose rates is investigated. The shift in the output characteristics curves and the effect of radiation bias-state on the body current decay, and the dose rate effect of back-gate transconductance, are analyzed. The results indicate that the shift in the saturation current at high dose rate is greater than that at low dose rate, when the irradiation dose is not high. This is primarily due to the scattering effect of interface state on channel electrons, which leads to carrier mobility degradation. Meanwhile, the recombination of free electrons and trapped holes is enhanced gradually at high dose rate, hence the reduction in density of the interface state.
The ELDRS effect appears in the decay tendency of the body current under the OFF-bias conditions, but not the ON-bias. This is due to that the applied voltage for ON-bias propels the ehps to separate more quickly and weaken the bimolecular recombination mechanisms. In addition, the differences in distribution of the strong electric field facilitates the easier inversion of the back-channel under OFF-bias conditions, which cause the body current to be collected, as the device is still in OFF state. The convex-concave peak of body current is observed under low dose rate conditions at 1 kGy(Si).
The donor interface-state of the buried oxide induced by irradiation can capture the channel electrons, inducing the double transconductance peak of back gate at 3 kGy(Si) under high dose rate. These indicate that the decay of back-gate transconductance has ELDRS effect. Thus, the interface state is the main factor that causes the difference in the characteristics degradation under total dose radiation at different dose rates.
Alpha-particle-induced effects in partially depleted silicon on insulator devices: with and without contact
. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 2011, 5: 52-58. DOI: 10.1049/iet-cds.2010.0080.Heavy-ion irradiation study in SOI-based and bulk-based junctionless FinFETs using 3D-TCAD simulation
. Microelectronics Reliability, 2015, 55: 2647-2653. DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.09.011.Total Dose Effects in Tunnel-Diode Body-Contact SOI nMOSFETs
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2014, 61: 3018-3022. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2014.2364923.Radiation-enhanced gate-induced-drain-leakage current in the 130 nm partially-depleted SOI pMOSFET
. Solid-State Electronics, 2015, 106: 81-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2015.01.023.Influence of channel length and layout on TID for 0.18μm NMOS transistors
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2013, 24:060202-6. DOI: 10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.2013.06.019.Threshold voltage degradation mechanism of SOI SONOS EEPROM under total-dose irradiation
. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60: 098502(1-8). DOI: 10.7498/aps.60.098502. (in Chinese)Total ionizing dose (TID) effect and single event effect (SEE) in quasi-SOI nMOSFETs
. Semiconductor Science & Technology, 2014, 29:15010-15016. DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/29/1/015010.Hardening silicon-on-insulator nMOSFETs by multiple-step Si+ implantation
. Microelectronics Reliability, 2016, 57: 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.12.015Tradeoff between low-power operation and radiation hardness of fully depleted SOI pMOSFET by changing LDD conditions
. IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 2016, 63(6):2293-2298. DOI: 10.1109/TED.2016.2552486.Characteristics of non-irradiated and irradiated double SOI integration type pixel sensor
. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2016, 831: 315-321. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.03.095.Study of the dose rate effect of 180nm nMOSFETs
. Chin Phys C, 2015, 39: 016004(1-5). DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/39/1/016004.Two Stages of Surface-Defect Formation in a MOS Structure under Low-Dose Rate Gamma Irradiation
. Semiconductors, 2016, 50: 349-351. DOI: 10.1134/S1063782616030209.Total ionizing dose effects in MOS and low-dose-rate-sensitive linear-bipolar devices
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2013, 60(3): 1706-1730. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2013.2259260.Hydrogen Limits for Total Dose and Dose Rate Response in Linear Bipolar Circuits
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2015, 62: 2476-2481. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2015.2500198.ELDRS in SiGe transistors for room and low-temperature irradiation
. Microelectronics Reliability, 2016, 63: 56-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2016.05.010.Dose Rate Switching Technique on ELDRS-Free Bipolar Devices
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2016. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2015.2512620.Predicting NMOS device radiation response at different dose rates in γ ray environment
. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52: 188-191. DOI: 1000-3290/2003/52(01)/0188-04. (in Chinese)Dose-rate effects of p-channel metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors at various biasing conditions
. Journal of Semiconductors, 2010, 31: 054004(1-4). DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/31/5/054004.Compact model for single event transients and total dose effects at high temperatures for partially depleted SOI MOSFETs
. Microelectronics Reliability, 2010, 50: 1852-1856. DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2010.07.040.Physical model for enhanced interface-trap formation at low dose rates
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2002, 49: 2650-2655. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2002.805387.Calculations of radiation dose-rate sensitivity of bipolar transistors
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2008, 55: 3009-3015. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2008.2007487.Modeling low dose rate effects in shallow trench isolation oxides
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2011, 58: 2945-2952. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2011.2168569.Modeling the effects of hydrogen on the mechanisms of dose rate sensitivity
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2012, 59:701-706. DOI: 10.1109/RADECS.2011.6131290.Total-ionizing-dose induced coupling effect in the 130-nm PDSOI I/O nMOSFETs
. IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 2014, 35:503-505. DOI: 10.1109/LED.2014.2311453.Worst-case bias during total dose irradiation of SOI transistors
. IEEE Trans on Nucl Sci, 2000, 47: 2183-2188. DOI: 10.1109/23.903751.Total dose irradiation of FD SOI NMOSFET under different bias configurations
. Journal of Semiconductors, 2007, 28:750-754. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-4177.2007.05.024. (in Chinese)