logo

Multi-proton emission at the limits of nuclear stability: challenges for extreme open quantum systems

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHT

Multi-proton emission at the limits of nuclear stability: challenges for extreme open quantum systems

Yu-Gang Ma
Nuclear Science and TechniquesVol.36, No.12Article number 236Published in print Dec 2025Available online 09 Oct 2025
14902

Introduction — Nuclei near and beyond the proton drip line represent a fascinating frontier in the nuclear landscape. Proton-rich nuclei exhibit intriguing phenomena, such as the Thomas-Ehrman shift and proton-halo structure. Beyond the proton drip line, nuclei become unbound, allowing protons to be emitted and giving rise to novel radioactive decay modes. Single-proton radioactivity, a process in which some nuclei with an odd number of protons (Z) decay by ejecting a proton, was discovered several decades ago and has been extensively studied [1, 2]. In comparison, two-proton (2p) radioactivity, which involves the simultaneous emission of two protons from some even-Z nuclei, was discovered in 2002 [3, 4]. This most recently identified decay mode, along with related phenomena, remains an active topic of research in nuclear physics [5-18]. More recently, multiproton emission processes – such as three-, four-, and five-proton emission – have been observed in the decays of some extremely neutron-deficient nuclei. These exotic decay modes provide powerful spectroscopic tools for probing the structure and decay properties of proton-rich nuclei far from the valley of stability, serving as ideal laboratories to explore exotic nuclear phenomena and test open quantum system theories under extreme conditions.

One of these exotic features that often emerges near and beyond the dripline is mirror and isospin symmetry breaking [19], driven by the large proton-neutron imbalance of dripline nuclei. Isospin symmetry is a fundamental concept in nuclear physics, positing that mirror nuclei – those with exchanged numbers of protons and neutrons – should exhibit nearly identical structures, that is, states with the same spins and parities and closely similar excitation energies. Under this symmetry, the ground states (g.s.) of the mirror nuclei are expected to have the same spins and parities. While isospin symmetry holds to a good approximation in most nuclei, striking deviations from this rule are of great interest, as they reveal subtle aspects of the nuclear structure and the underlying interactions.

Discovery of the three-proton emitter 20Al — In a recent article published in Physical Review Letters [20], Xu, Mukha, Li et al. reported the first observation and spectroscopy of the previously unknown isotope 20Al. This study revealed that 20Al is unbound with respect to the emission of three protons, as shown in Fig. 1. The determined decay energy of 20Al g.s., combined with a thorough analysis of its g.s. spin-parity, provided evidence for isospin symmetry breaking in the mirror pair of 20Al and 20N.

Fig. 1
(Color online) Schematics illustrating isospin-symmetry breaking between the three-proton emitter 20Al and its mirror partner 20N
pic

The experiment was performed at the Fragment Separator of the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany. The very neutron-deficient nucleus 20Al was produced in a charge-exchange reaction and decayed promptly by emission of protons. By tracking the trajectories of all its decay products with silicon microstrip detectors, 20Al was observed for the first time. 20Al has seven fewer neutrons than the stable aluminium isotope and lies beyond the proton drip line. It is the lightest aluminium isotope that has been discovered so far.

The authors performed a detailed analysis of angular correlations of 20Al’s decay products and found that the 20Al g.s. decays by sequential 1p–2p emission via intermediate g.s. of 19Mg. Specifically, the 20Al g.s. first decays by ejecting one proton to the g.s. of 19Mg, followed by the subsequent decay of 19Mg g.s. via simultaneous 2p emission. 19Mg is a known case of g.s. 2p radioactivity [21]. Consequently, 20Al is the first observed 3p emitter, where its 1p decay daughter nucleus is a 2p radioactive nucleus.

The decay energy of the 20Al g.s. was determined to be 1.930.10+0.12 MeV. It is significantly smaller than the predictions inferred from the isospin symmetry by employing the neutron separation energy of 20Al’s mirror partner 20N, which leads to an enhanced energy shift of the 20Al g.s. relative to the 20N g.s., as shown in Fig. 2. The unexpectedly low decay energy of 20Al indicates a possible isospin symmetry breaking in 20Al and 20N.

Fig. 2
Proposed decay scheme of the states observed in 20Al with decay channels via 19Mg and 18Na states, whose decay energies are given relative to the 3p, 2p and 1p thresholds, respectively. On the right, the two lowest levels of 20N are depicted, with their energies shifted by the mirror energy difference expected for the 20N–20Al pair. Adapted from Ref. [20]
pic

Theoretical developments and challenges — Observation of the three-proton emitter 20Al provides an ideal testing ground for modern theoretical frameworks of open quantum systems. To properly describe these exotic multi-particle emitters, the structural and decaying aspects need to be considered simultaneously. Although there is currently no comprehensive theory on the market, many frameworks are developing towards this direction [5, 7, 8, 22]. Particularly, in recent years, the Gamow Shell Model (GSM) [23, 24] and Gamow Coupled-Channel (GCC) approaches [25-27] have been developed to describe weakly bound and unbound nuclei by employing the Berggren basis, which consistently incorporates bound, resonant, and scattering states.. In details, the former emphasizes the role of the continuum in shaping many-body correlations, whereas the latter focuses on the decay dynamics of nuclear states, highlighting the interplay between intrinsic structure and low-lying continuum couplings.

Both state-of-art frameworks have been applied to study 20Al. In particular, the GSM calculations predict a dominant s1/2 configuration for the valence protons in 20Al, leading to a = 1- ground state, whereas its mirror partner 20N exhibits a = 2- ground state. This spin-parity difference highlights the breaking of the isospin symmetry beyond the proton drip line (Fig. 1). GCC calculations, treating 20Al as a deformed 18Mg core plus valence nucleons, further support this interpretation and underline the importance of core deformation and continuum coupling in shaping the low-lying spectrum of multiproton emitters [25, 28-31].

Despite these advances, theoretical descriptions of multiproton emissions remain highly challenging. First, accurate predictions require a delicate balance between effective nucleon-nucleon interactions, continuum treatment, and few-body asymptotic behavior. In addition, a fully microscopic framework is anticipated to describe the exotic structures and decaying dynamics on the same footing. However, this requires complicated frameworks and large computational resources. Finally, the scarcity of high-statistic experimental data on higher-order proton emitters limits the benchmarks available to validate theoretical predictions.

Outlook for multi-particle emissions — The discovery of 20Al as a sequential 1p–2p emitter opens the door for systematic studies of even more exotic multiproton emission phenomena. Known cases of 3p emission, such as 31K [32] and 17Na [33], suggest that sequential emission modes dominate, whereas democratic decay mechanisms may emerge at higher excitation energies. Looking further ahead, 18Mg has been claimed to be a candidate for four-proton emission, most likely proceeding via a sequential 2p–2p mechanism [34]. Similar processes are also expected in 8C and in the neutron-rich system 28O. Even more exotic modes, such as the reported five-proton emission from 9N [35], push the limits of nuclear stability. Further theoretical and experimental work will be required to determine whether the ground state of 9N is a genuine resonance or merely a scattering feature [7].

In addition to ground-state decays, multiparticle emissions from the nuclear excited states have also been observed [36]. For example, the excited states of 22Mg [10, 11] provide a new dimension for exploring these exotic processes and gaining deeper insights into the dynamics of extreme open quantum systems. However, the very short lifetimes and non-localized nature of such excited states make their structures and decay mechanisms particularly challenging to unravel.

Future developments in both theory and experiment are crucial. On the theoretical side, the integration of chiral effective field theory interactions [37] with continuum-embedded models and the inclusion of three-nucleon forces, will be essential for quantitative predictions. On the experimental side, next-generation radioactive beam facilities (e.g. FRIB, RIKEN, FAIR, and HIAF) with advanced detection systems will enable measurements of angular correlations, energy spectra, and lifetimes with unprecedented precision. Such coordinated efforts will not only test the robustness of isospin symmetry at the limits of stability, but also extend our knowledge of nuclear structure into the regime of chaotic multi-particle decays, potentially reshaping our understanding of the nuclear landscape far beyond the drip lines.

References
1. P.J. Woods, C.N. Davids,

Nuclei beyond the proton drip-line

. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 47, 541-590 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.47.1.541
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
2. B. Blank, M. Borge,

Nuclear structure at the proton drip line: Advances with nuclear decay studies

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 60, 403-483 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2007.12.001
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
3. M. Pfützner, E. Badura, C. Bingham, et al.,

First evidence for the two-proton decay of 45Fe

. Eur. Phys. J. A 14, 279-285 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2002-10033-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
4. J. Giovinazzo, B. Blank, M. Chartier, et al.,

Two-proton radioactivity of 45Fe

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 102501 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.102501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
5. B. Blank, M. Płoszajczak,

Two-proton radioactivity

. Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 046301 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/71/4/046301
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
6. M. Pfützner, M. Karny, L.V. Grigorenko, et al.,

Radioactive decays at limits of nuclear stability

. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 567-619 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.567
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
7. M. Pfützner, I. Mukha, S.M. Wang,

Two-proton emission and related phenomena

. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 123, 104050 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104050
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
8. L. Grigorenko,

Theoretical study of two-proton radioactivity. status, predictions, and applications

. Phys. Part. Nucl. 40, 674-714 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779609050049
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
9. D.Q. Fang, H. Hua, Y.G. Ma, et al.,

Exploring the edge of nuclear stability on the proton-rich side

. Nuclear Physics News 33, 11-16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/10619127.2023.2168911
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
10. Y.G. Ma, D.Q. Fang, X.Y. Sun, et al.,

Different mechanism of two-proton emission from proton-rich nuclei 23Al and 22Mg

. Phys. Lett. B 743, 306-309 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.066
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
11. Y.T. Wang, D.Q. Fang, K. Wang, et al.,

Observation of β-delayed 2He emission from the proton-rich nucleus 22Al

. Phys. Lett. B 784, 12-15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.034
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
12. L. Zhou, D.Q. Fang,

Effect of source size and emission time on the p-p momentum correlation function in the two-proton emission process

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00759-w
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
13. L. Zhou, D.Q. Fang, S.M. Wang, et al.,

Recent progress in two-proton radioactivity

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-022-01091-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
14. L. Zhou, D.Q. Fang, S.M. Wang, et al.,

Structure and 2p decay mechanism of 18Mg

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01479-1
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
15. Y.Y. Xu, X.Y. Hu, D.X. Zhu, et al.,

Systematic study of proton radioactivity half-lives

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01178-3
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
16. D.M. Zhang, L.J. Qi, D.X. Zhu, et al.,

Systematic study on the proton radioactivity of spherical proton emitters

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 55 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01201-7
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
17. D.X. Zhu, Y.Y. Xu, L.J. Chu, et al.,

Two-proton radioactivity from excited states of proton-rich nuclei within coulomb and proximity potential model

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 130 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01268-2
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
18. D.X. Zhu, Y.Y. Xu, H.M. Liu, et al.,

Two-proton radioactivity of the excited state within the Gamowlike and modified Gamow-like models

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 122 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-022-01116-9
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
19. L. Guo, Y. Niu,

Effects of isoscalar pairing force on spin-isospin transitions in 42Ca

. Nucl. Tech. 46, 080019 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.080019
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
20. X.D. Xu, I. Mukha, J.G. Li, et al.,

Isospin symmetry breaking disclosed in the decay of three-proton emitter 20Al

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 022502 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/hkmy-yfdk
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
21. I. Mukha, K. Sümmerer, L. Acosta, et al.,

Observation of two-proton radioactivity of 19Mg by tracking the decay products

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 182501 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.182501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
22. B.A. Brown, B. Blank, J. Giovinazzo,

Hybrid model for two-proton radioactivity

. Phys. Rev. C 100, 054332 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054332
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
23. M.R. Xie, J.G. Li, et al.,

Spectroscopic factors of resonance states with the Gamow shell model

. Sci. China. Phys. Mech. & Astro. 67, 212011 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2227-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
24. S. Zhang, Y. Geng, F. Xu,

Ab initio Gamow shell-model calculations for dripline nuclei

. Nucl. Tech. 46, 080012 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.080012
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
25. S.M. Wang, N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, et al.,

Structure and decays of nuclear three-body systems: The Gamow coupled-channel method in Jacobi coordinates

. Phys. Rev. C 96, 044307 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044307
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
26. S.M. Wang, W. Nazarewicz,

Puzzling two-proton decay of 67Kr

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 212502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.212502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
27. X.Y. Xu, S.Q. Fan, Q. Yuan, et al.,

Progress in ab initio in-medium similarity renormalization group and coupled-channel method with coupling to the continuum

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 215 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01585-0
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
28. N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, M. Płoszajczak, et al.,

Gamow shell model description of neutron-rich nuclei

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 042502 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.042502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
29. N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, M. Płoszajczak, et al.,

Shell model in the complex energy plane

. J. Phys. G 36, 013101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/36/1/013101
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
30. S.M. Wang, W. Nazarewicz,

Fermion pair dynamics in open quantum systems

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 142501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.142501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
31. S.M. Wang, W. Nazarewicz, R.J. Charity, et al.,

Nucleon-nucleon correlations in the extreme oxygen isotopes

. J. Phys. G 49, 10LT02 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ac888f
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
32. D. Kostyleva, I. Mukha, L. Acosta, et al.,

Towards the limits of existence of nuclear structure: Observation and first spectroscopy of the isotope 31K by measuring its three-proton decay

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 092502 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.092502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
33. K.W. Brown, R.J. Charity, J.M. Elson, et al.,

Proton-decaying states in light nuclei and the first observation of 17Na

. Phys. Rev. C 95, 044326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.044326
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
34. Y. Jin, C.Y. Niu, K.W. Brown, et al.,

First observation of the four-proton unbound nucleus 18Mg

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 262502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.262502
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
35. R.J. Charity, J. Wylie, S.M. Wang, et al.,

Strong evidence for 9N and the limits of existence of atomic nuclei

. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 172501 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.172501
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
36. Y.T. Wang, D.Q. Fang, X.X. Xu, et al.,

Implantation-decay method to study the β-delayed charged particle decay

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29, 98 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0438-5
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar
37. Y.P. Xu, S.L. Chen, D.Y. Pang,

Application of a microscopic optical potential of chiral effective field theory in (p, d) transfer reactions

. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01369-6
Baidu ScholarGoogle Scholar