Introduction
The primary objective of relativistic heavy-ion collisions is to create and study quark-gluon plasma (QGP), the deconfined state of strongly interacting matter believed to have existed microseconds after the Big Bang [1-3]. Over decades of experimental and theoretical efforts, the formation of QGP under laboratory conditions has been firmly established, marking a pivotal achievement in high-energy nuclear physics. Current research focuses on characterizing QGP properties, such as its transport coefficients, equation of state, and response to extreme electromagnetic fields, and mapping the phase diagram of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) matter [4-8].
The central focus of these investigations is the probing of collective phenomena in heavy-ion collisions, including anisotropic flow, global spin polarization, and chiral magnetic effects [9-14]. These observables, measured extensively across collision energies and systems (e.g., by the STAR, ALICE, and CMS collaborations), reveal that the QGP behaves as a near-perfect fluid with remarkable vorticity, intense electromagnetic fields, and signatures of chiral symmetry restoration [15, 16]. However, a critical challenge persists: the initial collision geometry (e.g., the reaction plane and participant eccentricity) cannot be directly accessed in experiments [17, 18]. Current methods infer the geometry indirectly via final-state momentum anisotropies, inherently conflating the initial-state properties with medium-induced effects, non-flow correlations, and event-by-event fluctuations [19-21]. This introduces systematic biases that obscure the quantitative links between the QGP properties and initial conditions, underscoring the need for direct probes of the collision geometry.
Recent advances have proposed photon-induced processes in hadronic heavy-ion collisions (HHICs) as a novel pathway to access the initial geometry [22]. When relativistic nuclei collide, their strong electromagnetic fields generate quasireal photons with polarization vectors oriented perpendicular to the motion of the colliding nucleus [23-25]. These polarized photons initiate coherent processes through both QED and QCD mechanisms:
QED-dominated channels: Photon-photon fusion into dilepton pairs (e.g., e+e- via
QCD-assisted processes: Coherent photoproduction of vector mesons (e.g., J/ψ) through photon-Pomeron interactions, where the polarization transfers to the produced meson [33-37].
The photon polarization direction is geometrically encoded by the initial collision configuration, which enables polarization-based probes of the reaction plane. Pioneering studies have validated this hypothesis. Xiao et al. [38] first predicted quadrupole modulation in the azimuthal angle of dileptons (defined by the relative momentum direction
In this study, we employed our established QED framework [40-42] to quantify dilepton production in HHICs, focusing on their dual sensitivity to both azimuthal emission angles (
Methodological Framework
The Equivalent Photon Approximation (EPA) provides a computationally efficient framework for calculating the total cross sections in heavy-ion collisions through the convolution of photon fluxes with the elementary _2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M001.png)
To overcome these limitations, we employ a lowest-order QED formulation based on the external field approximation. Following Ref. [44], the electromagnetic potentials of colliding nuclei in the Lorentz gauge are_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M002.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M003.png)
With the direct and cross Feynman diagrams of the lowest-order two-photon interaction for lepton pair creation, the matrix element can be expressed as [47]_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M004.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M005.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M006.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M007.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M008.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M009.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M010.png)
i=0, 3 terms: originate from nucleus 1 (direct/conjugate photons q1 and
i=1, 4 terms: sourced from nucleus 2 (direct/conjugate photons q2 and
We construct angular correlations as follows:_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M011.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M012.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M013.png)
Although the QED formulation provides precise calculations of angular correlations, the dynamical mechanism through which photon polarization induces angular asymmetry (with respect to the impact parameter) remains implicit. To unveil the physical origins of this connection, we traced how the field geometry (governing polarization directions) dynamically “locks” onto the momentum-space characteristics of the produced particles. Consider the electromagnetic field configuration in peripheral heavy-ion collisions: quasi-real photons carry linear polarization determined by classical electromagnetic fields. Specifically, the electric field vector _2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M014.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M015.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-M016.png)
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-F001.jpg)
Results
Figure 2 illustrates the azimuthal modulations of dimuon pairs with respect to the reaction plane in peripheral Au+Au collisions at
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-F002.jpg)
| Process and beam energy | pTl (GeV/c) | ηl | PTll (GeV/c) | Yll | Mll (GeV/c2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Au+Au |
(0.2,+∞) | (-1.0, 1.0) | (0, 0.1) | (-1.0, 1.0) | (0.4, 2.6) |
| |
Pb+Pb |
(0.5,+∞) | (-1.0, 1.0) | (0, 0.1) | (-1.0, 1.0) | (1.0, 2.8) |
| |
Pb+Pb |
(4.0,+∞) | (-2.4, 2.4) | (0, 0.1) | (-2.4, 2.4) | (8.0, 100.0) |
The invariant mass dependence of anisotropic coefficients
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-F003.jpg)
Figure 4 shows the rapidity dependence of these coefficients for 0.4 < Mμμ < 2.6 GeV/c2. The magnitude of
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-F004.jpg)
The impact parameter dependence of the modulation coefficients calculated for both the RHIC and LHC collision systems is presented in Fig. 5. Central collisions (
_2026_06/1001-8042-2026-06-102/alternativeImage/1001-8042-2026-06-102-F005.jpg)
Collectively, these results establish Φpair correlations as a precision tool for the initial geometry determination. The distinct dependence of
Summary
In summary, we employed a QED-based approach to systematically investigate how photon-induced processes can constrain the initial collision geometry in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC and LHC energies. This work introduces a novel observable, the total momentum orientation of the dilepton pair Φpair, which demonstrates significantly enhanced sensitivity to geometric features, exceeding Δϕ-based analyses in precision. By combining the complementary sensitivities of the photo-produced dilepton to primordial geometry via both Δϕ and Φpair, our calculations establish the QED-calibrated dilepton framework as a robust, multi-dimensional probe that enables model-independent reconstruction of the collision geometry, offers orthogonal constraints on reaction plane determination, and bypasses systematic uncertainties inherent to traditional flow methods. Future measurements of these observables are expected to provide direct and unambiguous experimental constraints on primordial geometry in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.
The quest for the quark-gluon plasma
. Nature 448, 302–309 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06080Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions
. Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102–183 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.085The Order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics
. Nature 443, 675–678 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05120Thermodynamics of strong-interaction matter from Lattice QCD
. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24(10),Collective flow signals the quark gluon plasma
. Nucl. Phys. A 750, 121–147 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.12.074Magnetic field evolution in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV
. Sci. Rep. 13(1),The phase diagram of dense QCD
. Rept. Prog. Phys. 74,Experimental study of the QCD phase diagram in relativistic heavy-ion collisions
. NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES 46(04),Azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200-GeV
. Phys. Rev. C 72,Chiral magnetic and vortical effects in high-energy nuclear collisions—A status report
. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 88, 1–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.01.001Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94,Search for the chiral magnetic effect with isobar collisions at sNN=200 GeV by the STAR Collaboration at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
. Phys. Rev. C 105(1),Electron-ion collider in China
. Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16(6),Vector meson’s spin alignments in high energy reactions
. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68(1),Bayesian estimation of the specific shear and bulk viscosity of quark–gluon plasma
. Nature Phys. 15(11), 1113–1117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0611-8Polarization and vorticity in the Quark–Gluon Plasma
. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 395–423 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-021920-095245Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions
. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 205–243 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123020Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35(12), 220 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01589-wTranslation of collision geometry fluctuations into momentum anisotropies in relativistic heavy-ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 82,Non-flow correlations and elliptic flow fluctuations in gold-gold collisions at sNN=200 GeV
. Phys. Rev. C 81,Event-shape fluctuations and flow correlations in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions
. J. Phys. G 41(12),Reaction plane alignment with linearly polarized photon in heavy-ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. Res. 4(4),Photon and gluon induced processes in relativistic heavy ion collisions
. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 503–564 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(97)00049-5Probing the linear polarization of photons in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Lett. B 795, 576–580 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.005Measurement of e+e- Momentum and Angular Distributions from Linearly Polarized Photon Collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(5),Low-pT e+e- pair production in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV and U+U collisions at sNN=193 GeV at STAR
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(13),(ATLAS), Observation of centrality-dependent acoplanarity for muon pairs produced via two-photon scattering in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(21),Coherent lepton pair production in hadronic heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Lett. B 781, 182–186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.006gamma-UPC: automated generation of exclusive photon-photon processes in ultraperipheral proton and nuclear collisions with varying form factors
. JHEP 09, 248 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)248Photonuclear and two-photon Interactions at high-energy nuclear colliders
. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 323–354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-030320-033923Report on progress in physics: observation of the Breit–Wheeler process and vacuum birefringence in heavy-ion collisions
. Rept. Prog. Phys. 86(8),Spin asymmetry and dipole moments in τ-pair production with ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions
. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67(8),Observation of excess J/ψ yield at very low transverse momenta in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV and U+U collisions at sNN=193 GeV
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(13),Exploring the double-slit interference with linearly polarized photons
. Phys. Rev. D 103(3),Exploring the photoproduction of ρ and ϕ in hadronic heavy-ion collisions
. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(11), 1167 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13503-0Centrality manipulation in exclusive photoproduction at the Electron-Ion Collider
. arXiv:2410.06676 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.06676Impact parameter manipulation in exclusive photoproduction in Electron-Ion Collisions
. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36(9), 157 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01704-5Momentum anisotropy of leptons from two photon processes in heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(23),Measurements of photon-induced J/ψ azimuthal anisotropy in isobar collisions at STAR
, inInitial transverse-momentum broadening of Breit-Wheeler process in relativistic heavy-ion collisions
. Phys. Lett. B 800,Discovery of higher-order quantum electrodynamics effect for the vacuum pair production
. JHEP 08, 083 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2021)083Exploring the higher-order QED effects on the differential distributions of vacuum pair production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions
. Phys. Lett. B 847,STARlight: A Monte Carlo simulation program for ultra-peripheral collisions of relativistic ions
. Comput. Phys. Commun. 212, 258–268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.016Impact parameter dependence of the electromagnetic particle production in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. C 47, 2308–2319 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.47.2308Nuclear charge and magnetization density distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering
. Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 14, 479–508 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-640X(74)80002-1Nuclear charge and magnetization density distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering
. Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 36, 495–536 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-640X(87)90013-1Impact parameter dependence of the total probability for the electromagnetic electron - positron pair production in relativistic heavy ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. A 51, 1874–1882 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.51.1874Coulomb corrections to the e+ e- pair production in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions
. Phys. Rev. A 61,Coulomb corrections and multiple e+e- pair production in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions
. Phys. Rev. A 64,A new algorithm for adaptive multidimensional integration
. J. Comput. Phys. 27, 192 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(78)90004-9ROOT: A C++ framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization
. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2499–2512 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.08.005The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

